论文部分内容阅读
通过研究CJCR的统计资料,结合中外科技期刊的实例,指出使用“来源文献量”作为衡量科技期刊学术质量指标所带来的负面影响,提出“总被引频次”比“来源文献量”更能体现期刊的学术影响力。
By studying the statistical data of CJCR and combining with the examples of Chinese and foreign sci-tech journals, it is pointed out that the use of “quantity of source documents” as a measure of the negative impact of academic quality indicators of sci-tech periodicals suggests that “total citation frequency” Literature volume "can better reflect the academic influence of journals.