论文部分内容阅读
现实生活中,因为规避限购政策、获得贷款、取得优惠、逃避债务、隐匿财产、避免家庭矛盾等原因,由一方实际出资,另一方作为登记人购房的情形屡见不鲜。而一旦当事人之间的关系出现不稳定,又或者出现第三方的介入,就会引发对房产所有权的争议。上海市第一中级人民法院于2014年审理的一起非为规避限购隐名买房案件再次将该问题推到房地产法律实务的前沿,另外2011广州市中级人民法院也做出过类似的判决,但该案件也不涉及到规避限购令。本文在分析两起案件的基础上阐述隐名买房案件的处理方式。
In real life, it is not uncommon to buy a house as a registrant because of circumventing restriction policies, obtaining loans, obtaining concessions, avoiding debts, concealing property and avoiding family conflict. And once the relationship between the parties instability, or the involvement of third parties, it will lead to controversy over the ownership of real estate. Shanghai No.1 Intermediate People’s Court in 2014 tried to push the issue to the forefront of real estate law practice again to circumvent the restriction of the purchase of anonymous home purchase. In addition, the Guangzhou Intermediate People’s Court made a similar verdict in 2011, The case does not involve circumvention of the purchase order. Based on the analysis of two cases, this article elaborates on how to deal with the case of hidden purchase.