论文部分内容阅读
我国证券侵权案件采取的诉讼方式选择了单独诉讼、当事人一方人数确定的诉讼代表人制度,拒绝了集体诉讼制度。这种选择固然有客观政治、经济、社会和法律环境的考虑,但是也留下了诸多问题,不利于充分保护投资者的合法权益。通过对证券侵权案件司法诉讼方式的国际比较,在诉讼方式上,我国应考虑政治、经济、社会和法律环境的变迁,在不同条件下对证券侵权案件的司法诉讼方式进行适当改良,甚至是较大改革,从而更有效地保护投资者合法权益。
The lawsuit method adopted by the securities infringement cases in our country has chosen the litigation representative system of single litigation and the number of parties, and rejected the class action system. While such an option has objective political, economic, social and legal environmental considerations, it also leaves many problems that are not conducive to fully protecting the legitimate rights and interests of investors. Through the international comparison of the judicial litigation methods of securities infringement cases, our country should consider the changes of the political, economic, social and legal environments in litigation methods, and appropriately improve the judicial litigation methods of securities infringement cases under different conditions, Great reform, so as to more effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of investors.