本文对权威性辞书我国的《政治经济学辞典》《辞海(经济分册)》和西方的《新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典》对“剥削”一词作的概念性释义作了比较分析。认为我国传统的释义有较大的局限性 ,而“帕氏”的释义却有一定的可取性。根据历史和现实的实践和理论需要作者提出了对剥削概念含义的新见解。 This article makes a comparative analysis of the conceptual definitions of “exploitation” in the authoritative dictation dictionary of “Dictionary of Political Economy”, “Cihai (Economic Volume)” in our country and “Dictionary of New Palgrave Economics” in the West. They think that the traditional interpretation of our country has more limitations, and the definition of “Pa’s” has certain desirability. According to historical and practical needs of practice and theory, the author puts forward new ideas on the meaning of exploitation.