论文部分内容阅读
对马克思的实践思想,仅从本体论的意义上去理解,或者仅从历史唯物主义方法论的意义上去理解,都是片面的。出于批判的需要,马克思哲学中的“实践”呈现出三种语境:本体论语境中的普遍性实践;方法论语境中的具体性实践;生存论语境中的人格超越性实践。这三种语境中的实践不是一种并列关系,而是一种递进式的“变奏”关系,并最终落脚在对无产阶级生存情境的分析和理想人格的引导上。
It is one-sided for Marx’s practical thinking to be understood only in the sense of ontology or only in the sense of the methodology of historical materialism. For critical needs, “practice ” in Marxist philosophy presents three contexts: universal practice in the context of ontology; specific practice in the context of methodology; personality transcendence in the context of existentialism practice. The practice in the three contexts is not a side-by-side relationship, but a gradual “variation” relationship and ultimately settles in the analysis of the proletarian survival situation and the guidance of ideal personality.