On the performance of web services, google cloud messaging and firebase cloud messaging

来源 :数字通信与网络(英文) | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:cutuf
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
Smartphones and other connected devices rely on data services,such as Web Services (WS),Google Cloud Messaging (GCM) and Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM),to share the information they collect or use.Traditionally,these services were classified according to the average number of bytes transmitted or their delivery time.However,when dealing with battery-operated devices,another important parameter to be taken into account is their power consumption.Furthermore,software designers and developers often do not consider the efficiency of a data communication system,but are simply conced about ease-of-use and response time.In this paper,we compare FCM,GCM and two types of WS,namely Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) and REpresentational State Transfer (REST) WS in terms of delay,data efficiency,and power consumption.The final outcome is that RFSTful WS outperforms all others,making GCM and FCM a viable altative only when the amouat of data to be transmitted is very limited,or when the mobile application requires the advanced services offered by FCM or GCM only.
其他文献
期刊
近年来光网络朝着高速率、大带宽的方向迅猛发展,设备数目快速增加导致网络能耗急剧增长。为了降低网络能耗,提高能量利用率,绿色IP over WDM网络的概念被提出,并成为光网络
Many real-world networks are demonstrated to either have layered network structures in themselves or interconnect with other networks,forming multilayer network
期刊