论文部分内容阅读
权利滥用是一个在法理学中常被提起的概念而在行政法中却鲜见。“陆红霞案”中法院率先以违反诚实信用原则为由对滥用诉权行为进行规制。但是法院的判决无论是从认定标准还是从标准的实施途径上,都存在不妥之处。避开“滥用诉权”这一难以界定的概念,通过制定一个信息公开申请行为滥用的认定标准,直接认定当事人申请行为滥用知情权,既能够保证不让信息公开异化为一种上访的制度,又能不过分地限制公民权利。较为合理的方式是制定信息公开申请案件的司法解释,明确赋予司法机关限制该权利滥用的权力或者修订《条例》,赋予相应的公开机关驳回滥用申请的行为。
Abuse of rights is a concept often mentioned in jurisprudence but rarely seen in administrative law. “Lu Hongxia case ” the court took the lead in violation of the principle of good faith to abuse the right to action to regulate. However, judgments of the court are not satisfactory either from the standard of determination or from the standard way of implementation. To avoid the abuse of rights of abuse, this concept of indecipherable, through the development of an information disclosure standards for the application of abusive behavior, direct recognition of the parties to apply for abuse of the right to information, both to ensure that information is not alienated into a system of petitions , But also can not unduly restrict civil rights. A more reasonable way is to formulate the judicial interpretation of the information disclosure application case, explicitly giving the judicial authority the power to limit the abuse of the right, or amend the “Regulations” and give the corresponding public authorities the right to dismiss the abuse of the application.