论文部分内容阅读
普兰廷加主张知识是被保证的真信念,而保证由三个密切相关的核心要件构成:恰当功能、设计计划和可靠性。无疑,恰当功能主义存在诸多问题,如与可靠论的区别问题、知识论的本体论蕴含问题等,这些问题的根源在于普兰廷加把为知识寻找“第三个条件”的后葛梯尔式知识论路径视为理所当然,导致其既不能坚持认知官能本身的探究,又不能在新的视角下重新审视知识的构成与本质。因此,为了弥补这两方面的缺陷,一种合理的建议就是引入当代德性知识论所实践的亚里士多德主义,即深入挖掘人的理智德性及其认知意义。
Plantington claims that knowledge is the true truth of assurance, and assurance consists of three closely related core elements: proper function, design plan, and reliability. Undoubtedly, there are many problems in the proper functionalism, such as the difference from the reliable theory and the ontology contained in the epistemology. The root of these problems lies in the fact that Plantinga tries to find the third condition for knowledge As a matter of course, the epistemological path of Ershi leads it not only to insist on the inquiry of the cognitive function itself but also to reexamine the constitution and essence of knowledge under a new perspective. Therefore, in order to make up for these two flaws, a reasonable suggestion is to introduce Aristotelian, which is practiced in contemporary epistemology of knowledge of nature, that is to dig deeper into the rational morality of man and its cognitive significance.