论文部分内容阅读
战后的日本仅仅用了40多年的时间就发展成为世界公认的经济强国,其成功经验就是充分发挥了人的积极性和创造性,同时把现有科技成果迅速转化为商品,从而大大促进了生产力发展,使其劳动生产率超过头号经济强国美国。十年改革开放,中国也取得了巨大经济成就,但其中科学技术创造的增长率不到20%。邓小平同志提出“科学技术是第一生产力”的论断对中国科技成果的应用和推广将产生巨大推动力。目前,世界各国已从政治冷战转向经济热战,产业结构也在作大的调整。这对中国来说,既是机遇也是挑战,而且科技进步速度越来越快,转化为现实生产力的时间越来越短,科技与经济日益紧密地相结合,世界经济的竞争已成为科学技术的竞争,而科技的竞争根本上讲就是人才的竞争。高素质的人才需要有良好的环境和教育才能培养出来。中国有大批科研成果和优秀科技人才,为什么中国生产力水平还是如此低下?
After more than 40 years, Japan's post-war Japan developed into a recognized economic power in the world. Its successful experience has given full play to the enthusiasm and creativity of the people, and at the same time rapidly transformed the existing scientific and technological achievements into commodities, thus greatly boosting the development of productive forces , Making it more productive than the number one economic power in the United States. During the ten years of reform and opening up, China also achieved great economic success, but the growth rate of science and technology creation among them was less than 20%. Comrade Deng Xiaoping's thesis that “science and technology are primary productive forces” will have a huge impetus to the application and promotion of China's scientific and technological achievements. At present, all countries in the world have shifted from a political cold war to an economic hot war, and their industrial structure is undergoing major adjustments. This is both an opportunity and a challenge for China. Moreover, the pace of scientific and technological progress is getting faster and faster, and the time for transforming it into an actual productive force is getting shorter and shorter. As the increasingly close combination of science and technology with the economy, the competition in the global economy has become the competition for science and technology , And the competition of science and technology basically is the talent competition. High-quality personnel need a good environment and education to cultivate. China has a large number of scientific research achievements and outstanding scientific and technological personnel, and why the level of China's productivity is still so low?