我们不能象地质学家鉴定矿石那样鉴定书画作品.如同中医学科一样,中国古书画鉴定带有相当浓厚的经验学科色彩.书画鉴定家和中医一样,越老越被敬重.然而,作为医学的中医有治愈疾病的客观可验证性,而书画鉴定缺乏这样的直接标准,其可信度在某种程度上毋宁称之为社会的公共约定性,亦即以得到同行或社会的公认为原则.有些作品的真伪能够得到社会的公认,而另一些却不能.真伪标准因鉴定家而有别.某著名鉴定家认定为真作品,很可能被另一著名鉴定家判决为伪.甚至某些意见相左的鉴定家们,决不同时出现在同一鉴定现场.以国家文物局组织的“中国古代书画鉴定组”为例,在这个最高权威鉴定小组对上海博物馆藏晋 We can not identify the paintings and calligraphic works as the geologists identify the ore.As the same as traditional Chinese medicine, Chinese ancient calligraphy and painting appraisal with a very strong experience of the subject color .As the Chinese calligraphy appraiser, the older the more respected .However, as a medical Chinese medicine There is an objective verifiability of cure diseases, and the lack of such direct standards for calligraphy and painting appraisal, the credibility of which to some extent is rather referred to as the public’s social convention, that is, to be recognized as a peer or the principle of society. Some The authenticity of the work can be recognized by the society, while others can not. The authenticity of the standard due to the distinction between the judge .A well-known connoisseurs identified as real works, may be judged by another famous judge pseudo .Some even some Controversial dissidents, never at the same time appear in the same appraisal site to the State Administration of Cultural Heritage organized the “ancient Chinese calligraphy and appraisal group” as an example, in this highest authority of the Shanghai Museum Collection