论文部分内容阅读
笔者有幸参加了2008年河北省高考文科综合历史科的阅卷工作,我们评阅的是文综37题,该题4个小问题共计32分。评阅工作尚未结束时,笔者随机抽样统计了63名考生37题的成绩,平均分为10.87分,得分率37%。其中最高分为21分,最低分为2分,及格人数为8人,及格率为12.7%。评阅工作即将结束时,我们得知37题的平均分约为10.06分。从以上统计数据看,37题的失分情况比较严重。阅卷结束后,我们仔细回顾了这次评阅工作,归纳了考生失分的主要原因,并进行了简要分析。以下是笔者基于考生失分情况分析而对今后的历史教学提出的一些不成熟的建议,仅供各位同
The author had the privilege of participating in the examination of the Comprehensive History Division of the Hebei Provincial College Entrance Examination for Arts in 2008. We reviewed the 37 questions of the literary essay, which included 32 questions in 4 small questions. When the review work was not completed, the author randomly sampled the results of the 63 candidates with 37 questions. The average score was 10.87 points, and the score was 37%. The highest score was 21 points, the lowest score was 2 points, the number of passers was 8 and the pass rate was 12.7%. At the end of the review, we learned that the average score of the 37 questions was about 10.06 points. Judging from the above statistical data, the situation of losing points in the 37 questions is more serious. After reviewing, we reviewed the review carefully, summarized the main reasons for the loss of candidates, and conducted a brief analysis. The following are some of the immature suggestions for future history teaching based on the analysis of the scores of the candidates.