论文部分内容阅读
目的深入探讨氧驱动雾化吸入和空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘的临床效果。方法选取我院收治的60例小儿哮喘患儿为研究对象,采用电脑随机分组的方法将60例患儿分为观察组和对照组,每组30例;观察组行氧驱动雾化吸入,对照组行空气压缩泵雾化吸入。结果两组患儿在疗效及症状消失时间上比较,观察组均占有明显的优势(P<0.05)。结论在小儿哮喘的治疗中,氧驱动雾化吸入治疗的整体效果优于空气压缩泵雾化吸入,在临床中可将其作为首选治疗措施。
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of aerosol inhalation and air pump inhalation on pediatric asthma. Methods Sixty infants with pediatric asthma admitted to our hospital were enrolled in this study. Sixty children were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 30 cases in each group. Oxygen-driven inhalation of the observation group and control group Group air compression pump atomized inhalation. Results The two groups of children in the efficacy and symptoms disappear time comparison, the observation group had obvious advantages (P <0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of pediatric asthma, the overall effect of aerosol-driven inhalation therapy is better than aerosol inhalation by air compression pump, which can be considered as the first choice of treatment in clinic.