论文部分内容阅读
目的观察不同雾化吸入方式治疗小儿哮喘的临床效果。方法选取医院收治的哮喘患儿88例作为研究对象,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组44例。对照组采用压缩泵式雾化吸入方式治疗,观察组采用氧气驱动雾化吸入方式治疗,比较2组患儿的临床治疗效果及临床症状消失时间。结果观察组总有效率为97.73%,高于对照组的81.82%(P<0.05);观察组临床症状消失时间,短于对照组(P<0.05)。结论不同雾化吸入方式治疗小儿哮喘的过程中,通过氧气驱动雾化吸入方式能获得显著的临床疗效,且能帮助患儿缓解临床症状,促使患儿快速康复,从而提升其生活质量,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To observe the clinical effects of different inhalation methods on children asthma. Methods Eighty-eight children with asthma admitted to hospital were selected as study subjects and randomly divided into observation group and control group with 44 cases in each group. The control group was treated with compression pump atomization inhalation. The observation group was treated with oxygen-driven atomization inhalation. The clinical effects and disappearance of clinical symptoms were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate in observation group was 97.73%, which was higher than 81.82% in control group (P <0.05). The disappearance time of clinical symptoms in observation group was shorter than that in control group (P <0.05). Conclusion Different aerosol inhalation treatment of asthma in children can achieve significant clinical effect through aerosol inhalation. It can also help children relieve clinical symptoms, promote rapid recovery of children and improve their quality of life. It is worth clinical Promote the application.