论文部分内容阅读
解决标准集未知题容易出错，目前人们主要从关系换位和关键词策略两个角度予以解释。该研究提出概念驱动假设并用4个实验加以检验。主要实验结果如下：学生编写出的问题主要是比较集未知题；解决标准集未知题和比较集未知题的两种先后顺序产生了不尽相同的干扰模式；数据加工水平影响概念驱动作用。在文章最后讨论了该研究对教学工作的含义。
To solve the standard set of unknown problems is prone to error, at present, people mainly from the perspective of the relationship between transposition and keyword strategy to explain. The study proposed conceptually driven hypotheses and tested with four experiments. The main experimental results are as follows: The problems that the students write are mainly compared with the set of unknown problems; the two kinds of order of solving the unknown set of the standard set and the comparison set of the unknown set have different interference patterns; and the data processing level affects the concept-driven effect. At the end of this article, we discuss the meaning of this research to teaching.