恐怖感是哥特小说中不可缺少的要素之一,如何营造恐怖感一直是批评家非常关注的一个技巧问题,但以往研究主要集中在分析故事内容/事件本身的恐怖以及哥特小说中不同类型的恐怖感的差别,忽视了不同类型的恐怖感对叙述者性格特点和聚焦角度有着不同的要求。本文通过分析《厄舍屋的倒塌》的叙述技巧并与刘易斯的《僧侣》加以对比,揭示爱伦·坡是如何通过叙述者的独特位置、有限的叙事视阈、变化的叙述可靠度及其虚构世界的特点等技巧的并置来书写“心灵的恐怖”的,以期弥补以往分析角度之不足。 Terrorism is one of the indispensable elements of the Gothic novel. How to create a sense of terror has always been a technical issue that critics are very concerned about. However, previous studies mainly focused on analyzing the horror of the story content / events and the different types of Gothic novels , Ignoring the different types of horror that have different demands on narrator’s personality and focus. By analyzing the narrative techniques of “The Fall of the House of Usher” and comparing it with Lewis’s monk, this article reveals how Allan Poe passed the unique position of the narrator, the limited narrative threshold, the varying degree of narrative reliability and its Fictional world features such as the juxtaposition of skills to write “terror of mind ”, in order to make up for the lack of previous analysis point of view.