论文部分内容阅读
最近,关于统计数据的准确性引发的中国经济是否有“水份”的讨论,正如火如茶地在各个层面展开,这些争议起因于西方一些学者对中国经济历史了解不深的误解。他们常用国际上目前通用的统计标准来检验中国的逐年数据,其结果可想而知。因为中国的原有的统什系统继承于苏联时期的统什思想,多以物质生产为主,非物质部门的统计数据反映得较少,这与当时过分强调唯物观的氛围有关,导致对非物质部门统计发展研究的弱化。而西方的统计则是对这两部门都采取了比较平衡的统计方法。特别是当今西方发达国家尤以第三产业为发达标志,因此对非物质部门统计方法相当科学和先进,当然它们也是通过
Recently, the debate on whether the Chinese economy is “water-wetted” due to the accuracy of statistical data is like a flood of fire at all levels. These disputes originated from the misunderstanding of some scholars in the West who have not understood the history of the Chinese economy. They commonly use the current international statistical standards to test China’s annual data, the results can be imagined. Because China’s original system of reunification inherited the idea of the reunification of the Soviet Union during the reunification of the Soviet Union and was dominated by material production, the statistical data of the non-material sectors were less reflected in the context of the overemphasis on the materialist concept of the time, Weakening of the Research on Statistical Development of Material Departments. Western statistics, on the other hand, take a more balanced statistical approach to both sectors. Especially in today’s western developed countries, especially the tertiary industry as a sign of development, the statistical methods for the non-physical sector are quite scientific and advanced, of course, they also pass