论文部分内容阅读
文章对比分析了德国基本法与我国宪法关于自然资源管理的规定条款,认为,德国基本法更侧重于保护自然资源,对于自然资源的合理利用规定更清晰,而且明确规定将自然资源纳入法治化,我国宪法则更侧重于合理利用自然资源,但合理利用的概念不明确,也没有规定通过立法进行明确。并分析了我国宪法关于自然资源规定在实施中存在的问题,提出我国宪法可从扩大自然资源的保护范围、明确合理利用自然资源的基本原则和明确关于自然资源的立法事项等三个方面借鉴德国基本法等建议。
This article comparatively analyzes the provisions of the German Basic Law and the Constitution of our country on natural resources management. It holds that the German Basic Law places more emphasis on the protection of natural resources, clearer the reasonable utilization of natural resources, and clearly stipulates that the natural resources should be incorporated into the rule of law. The more emphasis will be put on the rational use of natural resources, but the concept of rational utilization is not clear nor is it stipulated explicitly through legislation. Analyzes the existing problems in the implementation of the provisions on natural resources in China’s Constitution, and proposes that our country’s constitution can draw lessons from three aspects: expanding the scope of protection of natural resources, clarifying the basic principles of making rational use of natural resources and clarifying the legislative issues concerning natural resources Basic Law and other proposals.