论文部分内容阅读
近年来郭沫若研究陷入低谷,其困境在于官方话语、学院派话语以及民间话语的三重纠葛,学院派话语无法回答郭沫若研究的当下价值。只有祛除任何预设价值判断,从零出发研究郭沫若,郭沫若研究才可能走出困境。税海模的《郭沫若与中西文化撞击》描述了郭沫若在时代洪流中对西方思潮选择、接受、转换的过程,深刻清理了郭沫若的巨大遗产,极大推进了郭沫若研究。但该书用西方文学理论检视郭沫若,以宏大叙事构建郭沫若在中西文化碰撞中的地位,必然模糊了郭沫若的形象,论述方式上存在诸多问题。
In recent years, Guo Moruo’s research fell into the doldrums. The dilemma lies in the triple disputes of official discourse, academic discourse and folk discourse. Academic discourse can not answer the current value of Guo Moruo’s study. Only get rid of any pre-determined value judgments, starting from zero to study Guo Moruo, Guo Moruo research may be out of the woods. Guo Mo-ruo and “Impact on Chinese and Western Cultures” of Guo Shui-mo, described the course of Guo Moruo’s selection, acceptance and conversion of Western thoughts in the torrent of the times, profoundly cleaning up Guo Moruo’s great legacy and greatly promoting Guo Moruo’s research. However, the book examines Guo Moruo with Western literary theory and constructs Guo Moruo’s position in the collision of Chinese and Western cultures with grand narratives, which necessarily obscures the image of Guo Moruo. There are many problems in the way of discussion.