论文部分内容阅读
在司法实践之中,“以危险方法危害公共安全罪”是口袋罪的典型罪名。究其原因,是因为“其他危险方法”这种不法类型缺乏明确的限定,导致实践经常以后果严重来反推出行为危险,事实上是在法条文义之外适用法律,已经违反了罪刑法定原则。本文以同类解释为基础,旨在用语言学的义素分析法对“其他危险方法”在法条语义上进行同类解释,寻找语词之间的同类义素,从而从法条语词的本身去界定“其他危险方法”。
In judicial practice, “the crime of endangering public safety by dangerous methods” is a typical charge for pocket crimes. The reason for this is that the lack of a clear definition of the “other dangerous methods” is a violation of the crime and sentence because of the lack of a clear definition of the wrongful type of “other dangerous methods” Legal principle. This article is based on the same kind of explanation and aims to explain the same kind of semantics of “other dangerous methods ” by semantics of linguistics, looking for the same kind of semantic meaning between words and phrases, To define “other dangerous methods ”.