21世纪以来,随着农村社会的发展变迁和村民自治在全国范围的推广,这种以行政村为单位实施的治理陷入了困境。主要表现为:行政村规模普遍较大,自治困难;行政村村委会行政色彩浓厚,背离了村民自治的初衷;形成了行政村与自然村之间的矛盾。在这一背景下,广西贵港市的自然屯也面临着“村委会管不到,自身又没法管”的问题,农民自发创造了“一组两会”工作机制,将自治的重心下沉到屯一级,具有重要的实践与学理价值,是村民自治的复归。但这种工作模式在运行中也存在一些问题,如屯党员数量不足和质量不高,屯议事场所缺失,“一组两会”和村“两委”的关系未明确定位,“一组两会”运行中的经费问题未解决等,制约了该制度的长效运行,需要进行相应的改进和完善,使这一制度得以持续和提升并进一步推广,使村民自治焕发生机和活力。 Since the 21st century, with the development and changes of rural society and the popularization of villager autonomy in the whole country, this kind of governance implemented as an administrative village is in a dilemma. Mainly as follows: administrative villages generally larger scale, autonomy difficult; administrative village committee administrative color thick, deviated from the original intention of the villagers autonomy; formed between the administrative village and the natural village of the conflict. Under this background, the natural villages in Guigang, Guangxi are also facing the problem of “the village committees can not manage themselves and have no control over them”. The peasants spontaneously created the working mechanism of “one set of two sessions” The center of gravity has sunk to the Tuen Mun level, which has important practical and academic values ​​and is the return of villager autonomy. However, this mode of operation also has some problems in its operation. For instance, the number of party members in the village is not enough and the quality is not high, and there is a lack of proper venue for meetings. The relationship between the “two parties” and the “village committees” is not clearly defined. The issue of “one group of two sessions” running funds has not been solved, restricting the long-term operation of the system, and needs to be improved and perfected so that the system can be sustained, promoted and further promoted, so that villagers’ autonomy will be rejuvenated and vitality.