论文部分内容阅读
目的比较腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术治疗异位妊娠的临床效果。方法选取福建省漳州市人民医院2015年6—12月收治的异位妊娠患者80例,随机将患者分成观察组与对照组,每组40例。对照组患者予以传统开腹手术,观察组患者采用腹腔镜手术。比较两组患者观察指标(手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、肛门排气时间)、并发症发生情况。结果观察患者手术时间、住院时间、肛门排气时间短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论较传统开腹手术,腹腔镜手术治疗异位妊娠的临床效果更明显,可缩短患者治疗时间,减少术后出血量,降低并发症发生率。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of laparoscopic surgery and traditional laparotomy in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Methods Eighty patients with ectopic pregnancy admitted from June to December in 2015 in Zhangzhou People’s Hospital of Fujian Province were randomly divided into observation group and control group with 40 cases in each group. Patients in the control group underwent traditional laparotomy and laparoscopic surgery in the observation group. Comparisons of two groups of patients observed indicators (surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, anal exhaust time), complications. Results The operation time, hospitalization time and anal exhaust time of the patients were shorter than those of the control group. The blood loss during operation was less than that of the control group. The incidence of complications was lower than that of the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional laparoscopic surgery and laparoscopic surgery, the clinical effect of ectopic pregnancy is more obvious, which can shorten the treatment time, reduce the amount of postoperative bleeding and reduce the incidence of complications.