论文部分内容阅读
[目的]探讨乡镇卫生院免疫规划工作的综合评价方法,为免疫规划工作综合评价提供借鉴。[方法]以自贡市的91个乡镇卫生院为评价对象,采用综合评分法、Topsis法、秩和比法、综合指数法对各乡镇卫生院的免疫规划工作进行综合评价,并采用均值组合评价法对结果进行组合。[结果]4种综合评价方法的评价结果存在一定的差异。组合评价结果更加稳定、合理。[结论]不同方法得出的评价结果基本接近,能够比较真实反映乡镇卫生院免疫规划工作的开展情况,在条件允许的前提下,对综合评价结果最好能加以适当的组合,以使评价结果更加稳定、合理。
[Objective] To explore the comprehensive evaluation method of immunization planning in township hospitals, and provide reference for the comprehensive evaluation of immunization planning. [Method] Taking 91 township hospitals in Zigong City as evaluation object, comprehensive evaluation was carried out by comprehensive score method, Topsis method, rank sum ratio method and comprehensive index method, and the mean combination evaluation Law to combine the results. [Result] There are some differences in the evaluation results of the four kinds of comprehensive evaluation methods. The combined evaluation results are more stable and reasonable. [Conclusion] The evaluation results obtained by different methods are basically similar, which can more accurately reflect the development of the immunization planning in township hospitals. Under the premise of permitting, the best results of the comprehensive evaluation can be properly combined so that the evaluation results More stable and reasonable.