目的 分析湿润暴露疗法治疗烧伤对应的护理方法，以更科学的治疗烧伤临床治疗?方法 选择2017年12月至2019年1月我院收治的50例烧伤患者，随机分为两组，每组各25例?25例患者给予常规清创(纳入A组)，另25例患者给予湿润暴露治疗并实施相应的护理干预(纳入B组)?对比两组患者创面愈合时间?患者愈后生活质量评分，满意度以及随访结果?结果 纳入本次研究的50例患者创面以浅Ⅱ度?深Ⅱ度与Ⅲ度烧伤为主，其中B组患者各分度创面愈合时间均短于A组，均有较明显的统计学意义(P<0.05)?在为期3个月的随访中，B组“,”Objective To analyze the nursing methods corresponding to moist exposure therapy in the treatment of burns， so as to treat burns in a more scientific way. Methods Fifty burn patients admitted to our hospital from December 2017 to January 2019 were selected and randomly divided into two groups， each with 25 cases. Twenty-five patients were given routine debridement (included in group A)， and the other 25 patients were given moist exposure treatment and implemented corresponding nursing interventions (included in group B). The wound healing time， quality of life scores， satisfaction and follow-up results of the two groups of patients were compared. Results The 50 patients included in this study mainly had superficial Ⅱ burns， deep Ⅱ burns， and Ⅲ burns. Among them， the healing time of each graded wound of group B were shorter than that of group A， which was statistically significant (P<0.05). During the 3-month follow-up， no patients in group B had pigmentation or scar formation; group A had 3 cases of pigmentation and 3 cases of scar formation， the difference were statistically significant (P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction rate of group B was 96.00%， which was higher than 72.00% of group A， and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). After nursing， the quality of life score of group B was significantly better than that of group A， and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion For clinical burn patients， timely moist exposure therapy and comprehensive nursing intervention are beneficial to improve wound healing rate， reduce pigmentation and scar formation， improve patient satisfaction， and improve patient quality of life after nursing， which is worthy of clinical promotion.