论文部分内容阅读
票据对价是英美票据法系的概念,它对于理解英美票据法是一个十分重要的概念。在日内瓦统一票据法公约中并不存在对价的概念。这是两大票据法体系一个重要的差别。导致这一概念性冲突的一个重要原因就是票据无因性理论的影响。我国《票据法》第十条“票据的取得,必须给付对价”的规定,也首次将对价的概念引入到我国的基本法律之中。然而,我国票据法中并没有对票据对价的概念做详细的解释。笔者将从票据对价与票据无因性关系入手,阐述票据对价在两大法系中的作用,并重点探讨票据对价在我国票据法中的地位及作用。
Negotiable instrument price is the concept of the Anglo-American instrument law system. It is a very important concept for understanding the instrument of the Anglo-American instrument bill. There is no concept of value in the Uniform Convention on Instruments in Geneva. This is an important difference between the two big instruments law systems. One of the important reasons leading to this conceptual conflict is the unaffectedness of the theory of bills. For the first time, the concept of consideration is introduced into the basic laws of our country for the first time in Article 10 of the “Notes Law” of our country, “the stipulation that the notes must be paid”. However, there is no detailed explanation of the concept of negotiable instrument price in our negotiable instrument law. The author starts from the non-causality relationship between negotiable instrument price and negotiable instrument bill, elaborates the function of instrument negotiable price in the two legal systems, and emphatically explores the negotiable instrument’s status and function in negotiable instrument law of our country.