△如何对待传统,是本世纪以来思想界的基本焦虑之一。“反叛传统”与“弘扬传统”形成了尖锐对立的不同立场。自“五四”以来的七十多年里,“反传统”又形成了一个“小传统”,所有的激进派几乎都是从“反传统”的角度入手,这自有其合理性的一面。一种文化发展到极其圆热并趋于稳定,就必然会形成“文化的守旧性”,因此也就丧失了向另一种文化形态转化的可能。中国传统文化作为农业文化类型,在向现代化转型过程中,自身充满了拮抗性,在这个意义上,反传统可以说是中国实现现代化转型的催化剂。但反传统的“传统”,“鼓吹斗争,反对和谐,它力行破,而蔑视立;它主张无限制地动,反对静。这种社会文化的多动症,不仅与中国的传统背道而驰,而且是幼稚的病态的焦躁不安——其极端便是史称‘文化大革命’的那场全面痉挛。”因此“我们不能不承认以激进的方式来改造旧文化是失败的。或许新文化的激进方式本身就违背新文化而适合旧文化。……旧文化最可怕的也许不是它的文化内容,而是它唯一的、专制的存在方式和排它性,用新文化的专制去替代旧文化的专制,这是新文化运动中激进态度的核心,这实际上是不可能的,因为这种专制方式本身就是对新文化内容的否定和背叛。”论者因此讨论了“温和的意义”。由此可见,即便是在? How to treat the tradition is one of the basic anxieties of the world of thought since the beginning of this century. The “rebel tradition” and “promoting tradition” have formed sharply opposing positions. In the more than 70 years since the May 4th Movement, “anti-tradition” has formed a “small tradition,” with almost all radical groups starting from the perspective of “anti-tradition.” This has its own rationality . When a kind of culture develops extremely roundly and tends to be stable, it will inevitably form a “conservative culture,” thus losing the possibility of transforming it into another kind of culture. As a type of agricultural culture, Chinese traditional culture is itself antagonistic in its transformation to modernization. In this sense, anti-tradition can be regarded as a catalyst for China to achieve its transformation into a modern one. However, the anti-traditional “tradition” advocates struggle and opposes harmony, and it strives to break through the slightest contempt; it advocates unlimited movement and opposition to calm. This socio-cultural hyperactivity disorder not only runs counter to the Chinese tradition but is also naive The morbid anxiety - at its very extreme is the all-encumbered spasm of what was known as the ’Cultural Revolution.’ “Thus we can not but admit that defeating the old culture in a radical way is a failure.” Perhaps the radical approach to the new culture itself Contrary to the new culture and suitable for the old culture .... The most terrible old culture may not be its cultural content, but its only, authoritarian existence and exclusivity, with the new culture of autocracy to replace the tyranny of the old culture, which Is at the core of the radical attitude of the New Culture Movement, which is virtually impossible because the authoritarian approach itself is the negation and betrayal of the new cultural content. “The commentators therefore discussed” moderate meanings. " This shows that even in?