论文部分内容阅读
改革开放30年来,我国经济学出现了空前的繁荣和活跃,取得了长足的发展,这是有目共睹的事实。不过,与规模宏大、影响深远的经济改革与发展相比,中国经济学的创新与发展又远远落后于实践,尚不足为改革开放和经济发展提供有力的理论指导。中国特色社会主义市场经济发展的实践在促进体制转换、对外开放和结构调整,并引起人们利益关系发生深刻变化的同时,要求发展与建设同中国特色社会主义市场经济相适应的中国特色经济学,写出无愧于变革时代的中国特色经济学的新篇章。为了推进中国特色经济学创新与发展的讨论,我们邀请中国人民大学、南京大学、南开大学、辽宁大学、西北大学、河南大学长期从事经济学教学与研究的专家开展这个笔谈,以期推进中国特色经济学创新与发展的大讨论。这些专家不仅长期从事该学科教学与研究工作,而且担任校院(系)负责人,负责该学科的建设工作。当然,每个专家的观点只是一家之言,既不代表主持人的观点,也不代表学报编辑部的观点。
In the 30 years since the reform and opening up, there has been unprecedented growth and prosperity in the economics of our country and great progress has been made. This is a fact that is obvious to all. However, compared with the grand and far-reaching economic reform and development, the innovation and development of China’s economics lags far behind practice and is not enough to provide powerful theoretical guidance for the reform and opening up and economic development. While promoting the system transformation, opening to the outside world and structural adjustment, and causing profound changes in people’s interest relations, the practice of developing the socialist market economy with Chinese characteristics requires the development and construction of Chinese characteristic economics that is compatible with the socialist market economy with Chinese characteristics, Write a new chapter in the economics of Chinese characteristics worthy of the era of change. In order to promote the discussion on the innovation and development of economics with Chinese characteristics, we invited experts from Renmin University of China, Nanjing University, Nankai University, Liaoning University, Northwest University and Henan University who have long been engaged in economics teaching and research to carry out this writing with a view to promoting economy with Chinese characteristics Learn innovation and development of the big discussion. These experts not only long-term teaching and research work in the discipline, but also served as head of the school (department), responsible for the construction of the discipline. Of course, each expert’s point of view is only one statement, neither on behalf of the host point of view, does not represent the views of editorial board.