论文部分内容阅读
2004年春天,北京,在十届全国人大二次会议、全国政协十届二次会议上,三门峡水库问题,成为“两会”会内会外高度关注的焦点。来自政府官员、专家学者和民间百姓的各种鼎沸之声,通过人大代表、政协委员的提案,被媒体释放成一种热潮。两会结束前夕,来自陕西省60多名人大代表联名提出的《关于请求国家采取综合治理措施解决陕西三门峡库区防洪问题的议案》,被大会确定为第545号议案,三门峡水库终于被全国人大提点阵字库议事日程。 本刊关注三门峡问题的意义在于:如何凝聚全国人民的智慧解决这一困扰两省人民的共同难题。而更让我们期望的是,怎样建立一个容纳各种意见甚至是反对意见的科学的论证制度,让决策更科学,让三门峡水库的尴尬不再重演。
In the spring of 2004, Beijing, at the Second Session of the Tenth National People’s Congress and the Second Session of the Tenth CPPCC National Committee, the Sanmenxia Reservoir became a focal point of great concern within and outside of the “two sessions”. The various voices of voices from government officials, experts, scholars and civilians were released by the media into a craze through the proposal of NPC deputies and CPPCC members. On the eve of the end of the two sessions, the “Proposal of Requesting the State to Take Comprehensive Measures to Solve the Flood Control Problems in the Sanmenxia Reservoir Area in Shaanxi Province” jointly put forward by more than 60 NPC deputies in Shaanxi Province was approved by the General Assembly as No. 545 and Sanmenxia Reservoir was finally approved by the NPC Dot matrix font agenda. The significance of the magazine’s concern for the Sanmenxia issue lies in how to unite the wisdom of the people across the country to solve this common problem troubling the people of the two provinces. What further expects us is how to set up a scientific argument system that can accommodate various opinions and even oppose opinions so that the decision-making will be more scientific and the embarrassment of the Sanmenxia Reservoir will not be repeated.