多数学者认为,陪审制吸收普通民众参与庭审,其目的是实现司法民主,保障审判机关正确实施法律。然而,陪审制源于“人性恶”为基础的法治思想,与“人性善”为基础传统法文化有着根源上的冲突,另外,陪审制在我国严密的监督制度框架下似乎没有存在的必要,且与司法民主并无实质上的关联,因而,其价值是值得商榷的。 Most scholars believe that jury system to absorb ordinary people participate in the trial, the purpose is to achieve judicial democracy and ensure that the judiciary correctly implement the law. However, jury system originated from “human evil ” as the basis of the idea of ​​the rule of law, and “human nature ” based on the traditional legal culture has a root conflict, in addition, jury system in our country under the framework of strict supervision does not seem There is no need for judicial intervention in the real world. Therefore, its value is debatable.