Energy release process of surrounding rocks of deep tunnels with two excavation methods

来源 :Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:vicky1924
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
Numerical analysis of the total energy release of surrounding rocks excavated by drill-and-blast(D&B) method and tunnel boring machine(TBM) method is presented in the paper.The stability of deep tunnels during excavation in terms of energy release is also discussed.The simulation results reveal that energy release during blasting excavation is a dynamic process.An intense dynamic effect is captured at large excavation footage.The magnitude of energy release during full-face excavation with D&B method is higher than that with TBM method under the same conditions.The energy release rate(ERR) and speed(ERS) also have similar trends.Therefore,the rockbursts in tunnels excavated by D&B method are frequently encountered and more intensive than those by TBM method.Since the space after tunnel face is occupied by the backup system of TBM,prevention and control of rockbursts are more difficult.Thus,rockbursts in tunnels excavated by TBM method with the same intensity are more harmful than those in tunnels by D&B method.Reducing tunneling rate of TBM seems to be a good means to decrease ERR and risk of rockburst.The rockbursts observed during excavation of headrace tunnels at Jinping II hydropower station in West China confirm the analytical results obtained in this paper. Numerical analysis of the total energy release of surrounding rocks excavated by drill-and-blast (D & B) method and tunnel boring machine (TBM) method is presented in the paper. Stability of deep tunnels during excavation in terms of energy release is also discussed The simulation results reveal that energy release during blasting excavation is a dynamic process. Ann intense dynamic effect is captured at large excavation footage. The magnitude of energy release during full-face excavation with D & B method is higher than that with TBM method under the same conditions. the energy release rate (ERR) and speed (ERS) also have similar trends. wherefore, the rockbursts in tunnels excavated by D & B method are frequently encountered and more than those by TBM method. the backup system of TBM, prevention and control of rockbursts are more difficult .hus, rockbursts in tunnels excavated by TBM method with the same intensity are more harmful than those in tunnels by D & B method. Reduce tunneling rate of TBM seems to be a good means to decrease ERR and risk of rockburst. rockbursts observed during excavation of headrace tunnels at Jinping II hydropower station in West China confirm the analytical results obtained in this paper.
其他文献