论文部分内容阅读
历史研究活动中,受到各种客观因素的影响,群体及个人偏见、对立哲学思想、互异史学理论以及史料的主体意义对历史研究的影响较为突出。历史研究唯有克服主要因素的干扰,接纳这些客观因素的约束,才能被广大社会所认可接受。因此历史研究的客观性是史学良知衡量的天平。在历史问题上,“客观性”因素并非均等呈现,其与“主观性”较为紧张的关系主要体现在关乎现实利益的层面上。本文历史研究的实际出发,对影响历史研究的客观因素进行分析,旨在为相关问题的研究提供参考。
In historical research activities, influenced by various objective factors, the influence of group and individual prejudices, the opposing philosophy, the theory of cross-historical studies, and the subject significance of historical materials have a prominent impact on historical research. Only by overcoming the interference of major factors in historical research and accepting the constraints of these objective factors can we be accepted by the broad masses of society. The objectivity of historical research is therefore the balance of historical conscience. On the historical issue, the “objectivity” factor is not equally represented. The more tense relationship between “objectivity” and “subjectivity” is mainly reflected in the level of interests related to reality. In this paper, the historical study of the actual departure, the impact of historical research on the objective factors to analyze, to provide a reference for the study of related issues.