论文部分内容阅读
于今年9月正式启用的“上海新版历史教科书”引发争议,写这篇文章时,我在百度引擎上搜索到“上海新版历史教科书”相关网页约299000篇。淡化“毛泽东、长征、殖民侵略、革命、战争”“盖茨取代毛泽东;大幅削减古代史内容,用所谓当代文明史取代中国史;革命、战争、苦难内容被大幅删减,南京大屠杀内容只在初中部分简单提及”……这些是“上海新版历史教科书”引起争议的主要原因。这299000网页,有的是关于“上海新版历史教科书”的报道,有的是关于“上海新版历史教科书”引发争论的报道,相当一部分是关于“上海新版历史教科书”的评论。我想问的是,这么多的评论乃至斥责、反驳、咒骂、声援、支持的依据是什么?这299000网页报道、评论(包括一些重
When “Shanghai New History Textbook” was officially launched in September this year, it caused controversy. When writing this article, I searched on Baidu Engine about 299,000 related pages of “Shanghai New History Textbook.” Dilute the “Mao Zedong, Long March, colonial aggression, revolution, war” Gates replaced Mao Tse-tung; substantial reduction of the contents of ancient history, with the so-called contemporary civilized history to replace the history of China; revolution, war, suffering content was substantially deleted, Nanjing The content of the massacre is only briefly mentioned in the junior high school section. “These are the main reasons for the controversy. Some of these 299,000 pages are about the ”Shanghai New History Textbook“, some of them are reports of controversy about the ”Shanghai New History Textbook.“ A considerable number of them are comments on the ”Shanghai New History Textbook." What I would like to ask is, what is the basis for so many comments and even reproaches, refutations, curses, solidarity and support? This 299000 website reports that comments (including some heavy