论文部分内容阅读
Elsevier的一桩撤销论文案引发了学术著作出版事后审理制度及出版伦理建设问题的讨论。一方面,我国的学术著作出版机制尚不健全,不论是在编辑出版实践环节还是在编辑出版学理论研究中,都还没有注意到出版伦理问题,这与我国学术出版的“走出去”战略是不相适应的;另一方面,现行的撤销论文制度被用于纠正同行评议审稿制度过失或处理学术不端行为时,具有很大的弹性,且效力有限,并会给出版者造成经济和名誉上的损失。在中国学术出版伦理建设过程中,应当正视这些问题,遵从学术界和出版界的共同期望,构建有实践效力的撤销论文制度,以完善我国的学术著作评价体系和学术出版规范。
One of Elsevier’s revocation cases raised a discussion about the system of ex post facto publication of academic works and the issue of publishing ethics. On the one hand, the publishing mechanism of academic works in our country is still not perfect. No matter in editing and publishing practice or in the research of editing and publishing science, we have not noticed the issue of publishing ethics yet, Strategy is incompatible; on the other hand, the existing revocation essay system is used to correct the negligence of peer reviewers or deal with academic misconduct, with great flexibility and limited effectiveness, and will result in the publisher Economic and reputational losses. In the process of the construction of ethics of academic publication in China, we should face up to these problems, comply with the common expectation of academia and the publishing community, and establish a system of revoked essay with practical effect so as to perfect our academic evaluation system and academic publishing standard.