论文部分内容阅读
1990年由英国牛津大学出版社出版的名为《希腊城邦·从荷马到亚历山大》的论文集,收入了哥本哈根大学古代史讲师莫根斯·赫尔曼·汉森的近作,题为《公元前4世纪雅典民众法庭的政治权力》。 文中指出,存在于许多现代社会中的司法独立,使得许多历史学家或明或暗地把古代雅典的民主与现代民主加以类比,并且断言,在古代雅典的民主制度中,政权属于公民大会,司法权则归于祛庭。对史料的进一步研究揭示了与这种看法不同的
The 1990 Proceedings of the Greek City, Homer to Alexander, published by the University of Oxford Press in England, is a recent collection by the ancient history lecturer in France, Morgan’s Herman Hanson, entitled “ The political power of the Athens court of the first four centuries. ” The article points out that the judicial independence existing in many modern societies has led many historians to explicitly or subtly compare ancient Athens with modern democracy and assert that in the ancient Athenian democracy the regime belonged to the civil assembly, Judicial power is attributed to cured court. Further investigation of historical data reveals a different view