论文部分内容阅读
目的:VSD技术用于晚期感染创面的临床疗效评价。方法:选择在本院深度烧伤治疗的患者,对其中深度烧伤保守治疗迁延不愈4周以上,随机选取24人,分成试验组(12例)采用VSD治疗,对照组(12例)采用传统3-5%高渗盐水湿敷换药治疗。然后比较试验组合对照组的临床疗效。结论:采用负压封闭引流技术治疗晚期感染创面比采用传统3-5%高渗盐水湿敷换药治疗的疼痛程度稍低,同时肉芽达到植皮标准的时间短,治疗的费用也相对较低,所以负压封闭引流技术值得进行推广。
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of VSD technique in the treatment of advanced wound infection. Methods: Patients with deep-burn treatment in our hospital were enrolled in this study. Among them, conservative treatment of deep-burn was delayed for more than 4 weeks, 24 were randomly selected and divided into experimental group (12 cases) treated with VSD. Control group (12 cases) -5% hypertonic saline wet dressing change treatment. Then compare the clinical efficacy of the test combination control group. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of late wound infection with negative pressure drainage is slightly less painful than the traditional dressing with 3-5% hypertonic saline wet dressing, and the time for granulation to reach the standard of skin grafting is short and the cost of treatment is relatively low. Therefore, negative pressure drainage technology is worth promoting.