有所舍,才能有所得外出约文章,主观上总是想多约一些。特别是到比较远或交通不便的地方去,去一次不容易,路上往返就要耽搁好多天,所以就更想多约一些文章。这种想法是可以理解的,也是应该的。但是到了一个地方,一经同各方面接触,比较深入地了解一些情况,就会发现有许多可以约文章的线索。特别是各地各级领导干部亲身蹲点、加强政治思想工作和学习毛主席著作的群众运动开展以来,几乎每一个单位都有好的经验,都有可能写出好的文章。但是一个人、两个人的力量是有限的,外出的时间也不可能很长。在这种情况下怎么办?是面面俱到,还是有所侧重?我曾经是面面俱到,什么单位都想去,什么文章都想抓一把,什么情况都想了解一些。这种作法的好处是:接触的面广,认识的人多,了解的一般情况丰富,出发回来有可能报一篇洋洋大观的流水账。但是结果并不理想:一、没有真正研究一个问题,对许多问题都了解一点,也 Have some homes, in order to have income go out about articles, subjectively always want to more about. Especially to the more distant or inconvenient places to go, it is not easy to go back and forth on the road will be delayed for many days, so I would like more about some articles. This idea is understandable, it should be. But when I get to a place where I get in touch with each other and have a better understanding of some situations, I find that there are many clues that I can make about the article. In particular, since all the leading cadres at various levels in person have spent their time in their own places, strengthening the political and ideological work and studying the mass movement of Chairman Mao’s works, almost every unit has good experience and it is possible to write good articles. However, the power of one person and two people is limited, and the time for going out can not be long. In this case how to do? Is it all-encompassing, or focused? I used to be exhaustive, what units want to go, what articles want to grab one, what the situation wants to know some. The benefits of this approach are: a wide range of contacts, people know more, to understand the general situation is rich, starting to return may report an ocean view running account. But the result is not ideal: First, there is no real study of a problem, understand a lot of problems, but also