论文部分内容阅读
司法与民意不是对立,更不可能决裂,只是存在一种距离。法官需要对民意进行灵活地识别,有针对性地回应。民意的识别与回应需要建立正当程序和采取不同的策略。运用法律解释手段回应法律文本中的民意;运用事实方面的民意还原事实真相,节约司法成本;思考结论性民意背后的推理逻辑,但不直接采纳结论性的意见;将制度建设的民意作为日后司法改革的参考资料。建立科学合理的媒体交流平台,需要媒体在民意与司法之间保持客观公正的立场与姿态,避免媒体不当报道加剧司法与民意的矛盾。改善司法的运作模式和法官选任机制,降低日后回应民意的司法成本。
Judicial and public opinion is not the opposite, more impossible to break, but there is a distance. Judges need to flexibly identify public opinion and respond responsibly. Recognition and response of public opinion requires establishing due process and adopting different tactics. Use the means of legal interpretation to respond to the public opinion in the legal texts; use the factual public opinion to restore the truth and save the judicial cost; think the reasoning logic behind the conclusive public opinion but do not directly adopt the concluding opinions; and use the public opinion of the system construction as the judicial Reference for reform Establishing a scientific and reasonable media exchange platform requires the media to maintain an objective and fair position and attitude between public opinions and the judiciary, and to avoid media misconduct and to aggravate the conflict between the judiciary and popular opinion. Improve the mode of operation of the judiciary and the mechanism of selecting judges so as to reduce the judicial cost of responding to public opinion in the future.