论文部分内容阅读
目的 观察比较美林混悬液与安乃近注射液的临床疗效。方法 选择有高热症状的急性上呼吸道感染患儿（ 直肠体温≥３９５ ℃） ，１０１ 例随机分成２ 组，分别用美林混悬液和安乃近注射液治疗。结果 在第１ 小时内美林混悬液和安乃近注射液的退热效果及退热速度相同，而美林混悬液在第２ 小时就能使患儿体温降至接近正常体温，并能维持至８ 小时；安乃近注射液未能将体温退至正常，且从用药的４ 小时后呈回升趋势。美林混悬液对咽痛、头痛的缓解也比安乃近更为显著。结论 美林混悬液退热作用强，维持时间长，对咽痛、头痛的缓解疗效较安乃近显著。
Objective To observe and compare the clinical efficacy of Merrill Lynch suspension and metamizole injection. Methods Acute upper respiratory tract infection with high fever (rectal temperature≥395 ℃) was selected. One hundred and eleven patients were randomly divided into two groups and were treated with Merlin suspension and metamizole injection respectively. Results In the first hour, Merrill Lynch suspension and metamizole had the same antipyretic and antipyretic rates, while the Merrill Lynch suspension reduced the body temperature to nearly normal body temperature in the second hour Can be maintained to 8 hours; metamizole injection failed to return to normal body temperature, and from the medication after 4 hours showed a rising trend. Merrill Lynch suspension of sore throat, headache relief is more significant than the security of Arnold. Conclusions Merrill Lynch suspension has a strong antipyretic effect and maintains a long time. It has a significant effect on the relief of sore throat and headache compared with the analgin.