论文部分内容阅读
研究了中国西南岷江上游干旱河谷区不同类型景观边界的影响域.共选取三种类型的边界.以植物多样性为基础,分别采用主成分分析法和移动窗口法对边界的影响域进行分析.结果表明, 5条样带中,主成分分析法可以判定3条样带的影响域,而移动窗口法可以判定4条.两种方法均可判定边界的影响域,并且影响域均在距边界50m内.在林地样带两种方法可以得出相似的结论,但在花椒地样带中所得结论不一致.两种方法比较,移动窗口法更成功些.虽然两种方法各有利弊,但它们都是刻画边界动态的有力工具.“,”Three types of landscape boundary (forest/pepper field, forest/cabbage field, and forest/grassland) were selected in the arid valley of upper reaches of Minjiang River, southwestern China. On the basis of vegetation diversity, the depth of edge influence (DEI) on different types of landscape boundaries was estimated using principal components analysis (PCA) method and moving split-window techniques (MSWT). The results showed that in the 5 transects, PCA method was able to detect the edge influence depth with 3 transects, while MSWT could explain 4 transects. It is concluded that PCA and MSWT both can be used to detect the depth of edge influence within 50 m from the edge to the interior. Similar conclusions were drawn in the forest of each transect with the two methods, but no similar conclusions were drawn in the pepper field of each transect. Although the two methods have advantages and disadvantages respectively, they are useful tools for characterizing edge dynamics. Comparing the two methods, MSWT is more successful.