论文部分内容阅读
松花江水污染事件似乎已经开始被人们淡忘,但它留给我们的思考却还远未结束,留给我们的法律问题尚未解决。一年前,刘洪朴以及哈尔滨的部分企业和市民在水污染发生后,随即对吉林石化提起索赔诉讼,请求判令被告赔偿原告因其污染松花江导致全市停水给原告造成的经济损失等,但一年过去了,黑龙江省高级人民法院一直以“等待上边的意见”为由,拒绝立案,吉林省高级人民法院也没有走完应在7天内就该走完的“是否同意立案申请”这一司法程序。2005年12月7日以恢复松花江流域的生态平衡,保障鲟鳇鱼的生存权利、松花江和太阳岛的环境清洁的权利以及自然人旅游、欣赏美景和美好想象的权利为由,北京大学的三位教授及三位研究生向黑龙江省高级人民法院提起了诉讼,诉讼未被受理。导致这种状况的因素或许很多,但法律不健全也是一个重要的方面。单就环境损害赔偿问题而言,松花江水污染案件所暴露出来的法律问题主要有:(1)因环境污染致人身损害、财产损失及预期经济损失的赔偿及诉讼资格问题;(2)污染清理费用的赔偿问题;(3)环境生态本身的损害赔偿及诉讼主体问题,等等。带着这些问题,本文拟从国际油污案件及相关立法中得到启发,探讨环境损害赔偿及预防的系列问题。
The Songhua River water pollution incident seems to have begun to be forgotten, but it left us thinking is far from over, the legal issues left us unsolved. A year ago, after Liu Hongpu, as well as some enterprises and citizens in Harbin, instituted a lawsuit against Jilin Petrochemical and requested the court to order the defendant to compensate the plaintiff for the economic loss incurred by the plaintiff due to the pollution caused by Songhua River pollution, One year has passed, Heilongjiang Provincial Higher People’s Court has been “waiting for the top opinions” as an excuse, refused to file a case, Jilin Province High People’s Court did not finish should be completed within 7 days “Whether to agree to file an application ”This judicial process. December 7, 2005 To restore the ecological balance of the Songhua River Basin, to ensure the survival of sturgeon and pomfret rights, the Songhua River and Sun Island clean environment and the rights of natural persons to travel, enjoy the beauty of beautiful grounds and imagination, Peking University’s Three professors and three postgraduates filed a lawsuit in Heilongjiang Higher People’s Court, and the lawsuit was not accepted. There may be many factors that cause this situation, but the law is not perfect and is also an important aspect. On the issue of environmental damages alone, the legal issues exposed by Songhua River water pollution cases are mainly: (1) the compensation for personal injury, property loss and expected economic loss due to environmental pollution and the qualification of litigation; (2) the pollution The issue of compensation for cleaning up expenses; (3) the compensation of damages to the environment itself and the subject of litigation, and so on. With these problems, this paper intends to get inspiration from the international oil pollution cases and related legislation to discuss a series of problems of environmental damages compensation and prevention.