论文部分内容阅读
本文对异化概念及其理论沿袭进行了梳理,从不同角度对异化概念及其理论的发展进行分析,其中既包括西方马克思主义流派对异化概念及其理论的继承与批判,也涉及一些西方非马克思主义流派特别是北美社会学对异化概念的应用和扩展。但是也指出这样一种理论上的变化实则反映出的是异化概念的理论枯竭,批判的维度已经让位给了中立的立场。最后作者提出了自己的观点,异化概念基本贯穿于马克思整个思想之中,不仅在其早期著作《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中集中体现出来,在后来的《政治经济学批判大纲》更是将异化的经济与政治分析密切结合,直至《资本论》中对“商品的拜物教及其秘密”的描述都显现出了这样一种理论事实。
This paper reviews the concept of alienation and its theoretical follow-up, analyzes the concept of alienation and the development of its theory from different perspectives, including the inheritance and criticism of the concept of alienation and its theory by Western Marxist genres, as well as some non-Marxist Western Marxism The genre schools, especially North American sociology, applied and expanded the concept of alienation. However, it also points out that such a theoretical change actually reflects the depletion of the theory of alienation concepts, and the critical dimension has given way to a neutral position. Finally, the author puts forward his own viewpoint. The concept of alienation basically runs through the whole thought of Marx, not only embodied in his early book Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts in 1844, but also in the later Critique of Political Economy The alienated economy is closely integrated with the political analysis until the description of “the fetishism of goods and their secrets” in Capitalism shows such a theoretical fact.