本学期本人在学校的倡导下拜读了张海晨和李炳亭两位专家编著的《高效课堂导学案设计》一书,感悟颇多,但其中更多的是引发了本人对自己六年来从事普通高中教育的反思。正如本书在第一章《教案之殇》中提到的中美“预言”的例子,中国的“刻苦的好学生”居然没有美国的“懒散的不好的学生”成就高。这则例子真切表明,教育方法和方式的不同,最终的教育效果也就不同。从事普通高中教育的人,所面对的教育对象,也恰恰是所谓的“懒散的不好的学生”。这些学生大多数不热爱学习,但他们的智力并不低下,对生 This semester I read in the school’s advocacy Zhang Haicheng and Li Bingting two experts, “efficient classroom guide case design,” a book, a lot of insights, but more of them triggered my own six years in general high school education Reflection. As the book refers to the example of Sino-U.S. Prophecy mentioned in the first chapter of the “lesson plans,” China’s “hard-working and good students” actually do not have the American “lazy, poor students” High achievement. This example shows very clearly that the difference in the methods and methods of education end up in different educational effects. Those who are engaged in ordinary high school education face the same education target as the so-called “lazy, poor students”. Most of these students do not love to learn, but their intelligence is not low, students