论文部分内容阅读
目的:对大学生进行完美主义聚类分析。方法:175名大学生回答Frost多维完美主义量表、三维完美主义量表、流调中心用抑郁量表、自尊量表、积极情感、消极情感量表。结果:二步聚类分析结果表明存在适应性(适应性维度得分较高、非适应性维度得分较低)、非适应性(适应性、非适应性维度得分较高)、非完美主义者(适应性、非适应性维度得分较低)三类群体;与非适应性完美主义者相比,适应性、非完美主义者积极心理适应水平较高,消极心理适应水平较低,适应性完美主义者积极情感水平高于非完美主义者。结论:存在适应性、非适应性、非完美主义者三类群体,适应性完美主义者最健康,非适应性完美主义者心理健康程度最低。
Objective: To make a perfect cluster analysis of college students. Methods: 175 college students answered Frost multidimensional perfectionism scale, three-dimensional perfectionism scale, depression center scale, self-esteem scale, positive emotion, negative emotion scale. Results: Two-step clustering analysis showed that there was an adaptive (higher scores for adaptive dimensions and lower scores for non-adaptive dimensions), non-adaptive (higher for adaptive and non-adaptive dimensions), non-perfectists Adaptability and non-adaptive dimension score lower). Compared with non-adaptive perfectionists, adaptability and non-perfectionism had a higher level of positive psychological adaptation, a lower level of passive psychological adaptation, adaptive perfectionism The level of positive emotion is higher than non-perfectionist. Conclusion: There are three groups of adaptability, non-adaptability and non-perfectionism. The most healthy and non-adaptive perfectionists of adaptive perfectionism have the lowest mental health.