论文部分内容阅读
目的 本次研究主要观察急性脑梗死的临床治疗方法，并有效分析使用神经重症模式治疗的实际效果?方法 实施本次研究的时间为2018年2月至2019年2月，选择在这个时间内在我院参与本次研究的急性脑梗死患者62例作为观察对象?根据两组患者选取治疗方案的不同将其分成观察组与对比组?纳入31例患者实施常规内科药物治疗作为对比组，纳入31例患者收住神经重症科在多参数监护下运用内科药物治疗作为观察组?观察组包含16例男性患者，15例女性患者，患者年龄25~68岁，平均年龄为(46.58±2.48)岁;对比组包含17例男性“,”Objective This study mainly observes the clinical treatment methods of acute cerebral infarction， and effectively analyzes the actual effect of the neuro-critical model treatment. Method The time interval for the implementation of this study is from February 2018 to February 2019. Sixty-two patients with acute cerebral infarction who participated in this study in our hospital during this time interval were selected as the observation objects. According to the different treatment options of the two groups of patients， they were divided into observation group and comparison group. Thirty-one patients were enrolled in routine medical treatment as a comparison group， and 31 patients were admitted to the neuro-intensive care department under multi-parameter monitoring and treated as an observation group. The observation group included 16 male patients， and the remaining 15 were female patients. The age of the patients was in the range of 25-68 years old， and the median age was (46.58±2.48) years; the comparison group included 17 male patients， and the remaining 14 were for female patients， the patient\'s age is within the range of 26-69 years， and the median age is (47.71±2.36) years. The scores of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and modified Barthel Index (BI) were compared between the two groups， and the clinical efficacy of the two groups was evaluated at the same time. Result Observing the treatment effects of the two groups， the NIHSS and BI scores of the observation group were significantly better than those of the comparison group， and the total clinical effect rate of the observation group was 96.77%， and the total clinical effect rate of the comparison group was 87.10%. The total effective rate of clinical effect of the patients in the observation group was higher than that of the control group， and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Treatment of patients with acute cerebral infarction in the neuro-critical mode. Adjuvant treatment with non-invasive ventilator， mobile CT， and other instruments. Compared with conventional medical treatment， this method can achieve more effective clinical effects and can damage the nerves of the patient. The function is becoming more and more perfect， so that the patients\' activities of daily living will be further improved， promote the prognosis effect of the patients， and improve the quality of life of the patients.