审慎地进行法律续造,是广义法律解释中的特殊情形,是法官裁判中的抽象拟制和类型思维的必然体现。司法机关对法律的“续造”是一个理论问题,那么它是不是一个现实问题?这可能是一个在有关法律文化传统、法律文明类型的国家或地区的一个极具挑战的深邃而前沿的问题,那么其是不是一个在“法治”“中国”的实践中应予采纳和焕发的举措?有没有在法治中国建设进程中随着实现国家治理体系和治理能力现代化而得以容许和作用的制度空间?假定有,法律续造的权力依据和权力属性是怎样的?是不是 Judicious rehabilitation of the law is a special case of generalized legal interpretation, which is an inevitable reflection of abstract formulation and type thinking in the judge’s judgment. It is not a realistic question that the judiciary is a theoretical issue for the “continuation of law” of the law. This may be a challenging and profound frontier in a country or region with a legal, cultural and legal, and legal civilization Whether it is an act that should be adopted and rejuvenated in the practice of “rule of law ” “China ” and whether it has been achieved in the course of building the rule of law in China in line with the modernization of the state governing system and governing capacity Permitted and the role of the institutional space? Assuming there is, the legal basis for the renewal of power and power attributes is what?