论文部分内容阅读
近年来,剽窃行为在各个领域层出不穷,在著作权方面的剽窃行为尤为严重。很多作者通过司法途径维护自己的合法权益,但是结果却不尽人意。究其原因,国内现有的法律仅对何种行为构成剽窃作出了原则性的规定,没有明文的具体适用规则导致了作者维权难的状况。本文从剽窃行为的法律界定入手,分析了剽窃行为的特征,并通过分析司法实践中常用的几种认定剽窃行为的方式,试图准确的构建出认定剽窃行为的具体方法,期望对司法实践作出些许贡献。
In recent years, plagiarism has sprung up in all fields and the plagiarism of copyrights has been particularly serious. Many authors safeguard their legal rights through judicial channels, but the results are not satisfactory. The reason for this is that the existing laws in the country provide only principles on what constitutes plagiarism, and the absence of expressly applicable rules has led to the author’s difficult rights protection. This article begins with the legal definition of plagiarism and analyzes the characteristics of plagiarism. By analyzing several commonly used methods of identifying plagiarism in judicial practice, this article attempts to accurately construct a concrete method of identifying plagiarism and hopes to make some judgments about judicial practice contribution.