一、解答“文心对应”规律有关问题(一)问题李文第一部分小标题——“‘言为心声和‘语言是思想的直接现实’被误读,它们不能证明‘文心对应’规律的真实性”。对笔者提出的“文心对应”规律提出质疑。首先列举笔者关于“文心对应”规律的一段解说文字亮出靶子:“吴文”写道:“文心对应”的理论认为既然中外先哲俱云:‘言为心声’,‘语言是思想的直接现实’,那么作为一种相互联系、相 First, the answer “Wen Xin corresponding ” law related issues (a) the first part of the problem Li Wen subtitle - “” words as the voice and “language is the direct reality of thinking ” is misread, they can not prove Corresponds to the ’truth of the law’. I raised the author’s “correspondence between the” law questioned. First of all, the author lists a paragraph of commentary on the law of “Wen Xin corresponding ” highlights the target: “Wu Wen ” wrote: “Wen Xin corresponding ” theory that since the Chinese and foreign philosophers said: , ’Language is the direct reality of thinking’, then as an interrelationship, phase