论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨“跨区域转诊追踪”管理模式和“常规跨区转诊”管理模式对流动人口肺结核患者减少中断治疗的影响。方法将流动人口肺结核患者随机分为研究组和对照组,分别实施“跨区域转诊追踪”管理模式和“常规跨区转诊”管理模式的管理,然后分析两种不同管理模式对病人中断治疗率的影响。结果实施“跨区域转诊追踪”管理模式(研究组)流动人口肺结核患者中断治疗率为2.0%,“常规跨区转诊”管理模式(对照组)流动人口肺结核患者中断治疗率为9.0%,研究组病人的中断治疗率明显低于对照组(μ=3.04P<0.01),2组有明显差异。结论 “跨区域转诊追踪”管理模式能明显降低跨区域转诊流动人口肺结核的中断治疗率。
Objective To explore the impact of “cross-regional referral tracking” management mode and “conventional cross-referral referral management mode” on the reduction of interruption of treatment in floating population with pulmonary tuberculosis. Methods Floating population pulmonary tuberculosis patients were randomly divided into study group and control group. The management of trans-regional referral follow-up and management of regular cross-referral were respectively implemented. Then two different management modes Impact on patient discontinuation rate. Results The inter-regional referral and follow-up management mode (study group) was discontinued in 2.0% of TB patients with floating population and the discontinuation rate of TB patients in floating population was lower than that in the control group Was 9.0%. The treatment rate of patients in the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group (μ = 3.04P <0.01). There were significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion “Cross-regional referral tracking ” management mode can significantly reduce the inter-regional referral floating population of tuberculosis interrupt treatment rate.