论文部分内容阅读
前言近几年来,围绕交通事故侵权损害赔偿问题,法学界进行了激烈的争论。2003年10月28日通过并于2004年5月1日生效的《中华人民共和国道路交通安全法》(以下简称《交通安全法》)既反映了此前法学界争论的结果,同时又引发了新一轮的争论。争论的焦点在于交通事故侵权损害赔偿应该采取什么样的归责原则,损害赔偿的额度如何把握;而争论背后所反映价值理念则是效率与公平何者优先的问题。笔者认为,效率与公平都是当今中国社会不可或缺的价值追求,不可在强调一种的价值追求的情况下,忽略另一种价值的重要性。而现存的法律制度资源也为我们协调这两种价值的冲突提供了现实的可能性。本文引入了经济学的方法,这不仅因为在效率的分析上,经济学的方法是最具有工具价值的,而且因为公平问题也已经成为现代经济学关注的一个主要问题,为此,笔者对其进行了分析和探讨。
Preface In recent years, the law circle has heated arguments over the compensation for damages caused by traffic accidents. The Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as Traffic Safety Law), passed on October 28, 2003 and entered into force on May 1, 2004, not only reflects the previous controversy in the field of law but also has triggered new A round of argument. The focus of the debate is on what principle of liability should be taken for compensation for damage caused by traffic accidents and how the amount of compensation should be grasped. The concept of value reflected in the debate is a matter of priority between efficiency and fairness. The author believes that efficiency and fairness are the indispensable values pursued by Chinese society today. We should not neglect the importance of another kind of value under the stress of emphasizing one kind of value pursuit. The existing resources of the legal system also provide a realistic possibility for us to coordinate the conflicts between these two values. This article introduces the method of economics, not only because of its efficiency, but also because the method of economics is the most instrumental one, and because the issue of fairness has also become a major concern in modern economics. For this reason, Carried out analysis and discussion.