论文部分内容阅读
基于文献的评价往往无法针对特定年龄阶段的科研人员进行,因为文献著录项目中没有年龄这一字段。笔者所在课题组利用SCOPUS文摘与引文数据库,以机构为单位计算三个指标:该机构40岁以下科学家发表论文的篇均被引次数,篇均被引次数越多分越高;40岁以下科学家发表论文的被引次数进入本领域前5%的人的数量,人越多分越高;该机构所有这些40岁以下科学家的平均年龄,年龄越低分越高。对上述指标进行归一化,并根据指标权重对研究机构进行排名,评价中国主要科教机构在青年科学家培养方面的表现。
Literature-based reviews often fail to work for researchers of a particular age group because there is no age field in bibliographic entries. The author’s group uses the SCOPUS Digest and Citation Database to calculate three indicators in terms of institutions: the institution under the age of 40 cited articles cited in articles, the higher the number of citation cited, the higher the scores of citations; the under 40 published The higher the number of citations in the top 5% of the cited citations in the field, the lower the average age for all of those under 40 in the agency. The above indexes are normalized, and the research institutes are ranked according to the indicator weights, and the performances of the major scientific and technological institutions in China on the training of young scientists are evaluated.