我国法律明确而严格地规定了逮捕的三个法定条件。但在司法实践中,公、检、法三机关对实施逮捕三条件的理解存在分歧,主要表现在:对可能判处徒刑以上的刑罚的理解机械化;混淆诉讼各时期的证明要求;“以捕代侦”提法的片面性。并在此基础上提出了根治对策。 Our law clearly and strictly stipulates the three statutory conditions for arrest. However, in judicial practice, there are differences between the three organs of public security, seizure and law on the implementation of the three conditions of arrest, mainly manifested in: mechanization of understanding of the penalties that may impose a penalty of imprisonment or more; confusing the certification requirements of various periods of litigation; Detective "one-sidedness of the reference. And on this basis, put forward the radical countermeasures.